Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Okay, one more try.
So my test post revealed that my feedburner function is not working. So I "resynced" it (whatever that means) and hopefully it will now. Unfortunately, it requires yet another test post.
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Test Post and Feedback
Sorry for this, but I need to do a test post, as I think that my subscriber function may not be sending out updates.
While I'm at it, if anyone has suggestions for the site, please comment. Always looking for ways to improve it.
While I'm at it, if anyone has suggestions for the site, please comment. Always looking for ways to improve it.
Thursday, April 15, 2010
State Settlement with Pfizer
I missed this when it ran, but stumbled across it when looking for recent verdicts, settlements, etc. The below ran in the Post and Courier on April 3, 2010, and while it lasts you can find it here. I have cut and pasted the article below.
------------------
Pfizer, S.C. settle dispute over off-label promotions
By MEG KINNARD • Associated Press • April 3, 2010
COLUMBIA, S.C. — South Carolina is to receive $11 million under an agreement with Pfizer Inc. over the company's disputed sales tactics for certain drugs, double the amount the state said Friday it would have gotten under a multistate deal struck last year.
Under the deal finalized Thursday and confirmed by Pfizer, the New York-based pharmaceutical giant also is to give South Carolina more than $1.5 million in medications for use in its free clinics.
In September, federal prosecutors hit Pfizer with $2.3 billion in fines over what they called the improper promotion of drugs -- including painkiller Bextra and the schizophrenia medicine Geodon -- that included plying doctors with free golf, massages, and resort junkets.
Use of drugs for so-called "off-label" medical conditions is not uncommon, but manufacturers are prohibited from marketing drugs for uses that have not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Prosecutors said junkets and other company-paid perks were designed to promote the drugs to doctors for unapproved uses and dosages, backed by false and misleading claims about safety and effectiveness.
Bextra, for instance, was approved for arthritis, but prosecutors had said Pfizer promoted it for acute pain, and in dosages above the approved maximum. In 2005, Bextra was pulled from the U.S. market amid mounting evidence it raised the risk of heart attack, stroke and death.
In addition to a $1.2 billion criminal fine, the company also agreed to pay $1 billion in civil penalties, the Justice Department said in September. Of that amount, $331 million was to be split among 49 states and the District of Columbia.
South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster -- who is seeking his state's Republican nomination for governor -- sparked controversy when that deal was announced, saying he had opted out of the multistate agreement to pursue his own case against Pfizer to seek a better deal for the state.
That gamble seems to have paid off.
McMaster spokesman Mark Plowden says the state would have gotten about $5.5 million if it had participated in the multistate deal, according to a formula set by the court system.
In a statement, Pfizer acknowledged no wrongdoing and said it was pleased with the deal.
Under the individual agreement, South Carolina is getting a combined $12.68 million in money and prescription drugs. Plowden said the deal has been a year in the making.
It will take South Carolina about a month to receive the money, which Plowden said will go to the state's Medicaid coffers and state health care plan.
------------------
Pfizer, S.C. settle dispute over off-label promotions
By MEG KINNARD • Associated Press • April 3, 2010
COLUMBIA, S.C. — South Carolina is to receive $11 million under an agreement with Pfizer Inc. over the company's disputed sales tactics for certain drugs, double the amount the state said Friday it would have gotten under a multistate deal struck last year.
Under the deal finalized Thursday and confirmed by Pfizer, the New York-based pharmaceutical giant also is to give South Carolina more than $1.5 million in medications for use in its free clinics.
In September, federal prosecutors hit Pfizer with $2.3 billion in fines over what they called the improper promotion of drugs -- including painkiller Bextra and the schizophrenia medicine Geodon -- that included plying doctors with free golf, massages, and resort junkets.
Use of drugs for so-called "off-label" medical conditions is not uncommon, but manufacturers are prohibited from marketing drugs for uses that have not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Prosecutors said junkets and other company-paid perks were designed to promote the drugs to doctors for unapproved uses and dosages, backed by false and misleading claims about safety and effectiveness.
Bextra, for instance, was approved for arthritis, but prosecutors had said Pfizer promoted it for acute pain, and in dosages above the approved maximum. In 2005, Bextra was pulled from the U.S. market amid mounting evidence it raised the risk of heart attack, stroke and death.
In addition to a $1.2 billion criminal fine, the company also agreed to pay $1 billion in civil penalties, the Justice Department said in September. Of that amount, $331 million was to be split among 49 states and the District of Columbia.
South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster -- who is seeking his state's Republican nomination for governor -- sparked controversy when that deal was announced, saying he had opted out of the multistate agreement to pursue his own case against Pfizer to seek a better deal for the state.
That gamble seems to have paid off.
McMaster spokesman Mark Plowden says the state would have gotten about $5.5 million if it had participated in the multistate deal, according to a formula set by the court system.
In a statement, Pfizer acknowledged no wrongdoing and said it was pleased with the deal.
Under the individual agreement, South Carolina is getting a combined $12.68 million in money and prescription drugs. Plowden said the deal has been a year in the making.
It will take South Carolina about a month to receive the money, which Plowden said will go to the state's Medicaid coffers and state health care plan.
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Happy Easter!
Happy Easter to any followers of the South Carolina Products Liability Law Blog!
I will be attending the DRI Products Liability Committee meeting this week in Las Vegas, Nevada (details here). I am flying in on Tuesday, staying for all of the conference, and staying a couple of extra days to see and enjoy Las Vegas with my wife, who is joining me.
If anyone else will be attending, please let me know! I would love to have the opportunity to meet you.
I will be attending the DRI Products Liability Committee meeting this week in Las Vegas, Nevada (details here). I am flying in on Tuesday, staying for all of the conference, and staying a couple of extra days to see and enjoy Las Vegas with my wife, who is joining me.
If anyone else will be attending, please let me know! I would love to have the opportunity to meet you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)