data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec9ce/ec9ce2860050b35fbd5daa101a86a395acf7eade" alt=""
It was extremely worthwhile and not what I expected. I knew that -- because of the duration -- it was going to be a "deep dive" into conflict resolution and negotiation theory/practice. I figured there would be some human behavior and psychology sprinkled in. However, let's be honest: if this was 40 hours of lecture on those topics, it would cease being interesting at some point and become a "snoozer."
Instead, the course did a great job of mixing theory, practice, and a lot of role play in the mediation process. Each participant had an opportunity to play the role of a mediator in various scenarios, and it was a great opportunity to apply what was learned during the discussion portions of the training.
I also learned that participating in a ton of mediations as counsel for a party does not automatically equate to being a good mediator. The training really illustrated the differences in being an advocate versus being a neutral, which is the role of a mediator. The training will obviously affect how I serve as a mediator in cases (once I get an opportunity to mediate some cases), but I think it will also impact how I represent clients at mediation. I think having insight into the role and tactics of a mediator will be valuable when I am wearing my "advocate" hat because I have a better idea of how the mediator is approaching the case to try and foster a resolution.
After completing the training, I submitted my application to be a certified as a Civil Court Mediator, and I received my certificate today! I look forward to developing mediation as an area of practice in the future. I also intend to check out any articles that may be out there that deal with any specific issues/nuances for mediating the products liability case.
This post is subject to the DISCLAIMER AND TERMS OF USE of this website.
No comments:
Post a Comment